TELLME: Test-Enhanced Learning for Language Model Enrichment

Continual pre-training with descriptive quiz-style QA, inspired by the testing effect, for domain knowledge acquisition and long-term retention in LLMs

Findings of EACL 2026

Minjun Kim1,*, Inho Won1,*, HyeonSeok Lim1, MinKyu Kim2, Junghun Yuk1, Wooyoung Go3, Jongyoul Park2, Jungyeul Park1, KyungTae Lim1,†

1Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) 2Seoul National University of Science and Technology 3National Security Research Institute

*Equal contribution   †Corresponding author

A Bloomberg news excerpt about the ECB offering longer loans and full-allotment operations. Below it, the InstPT question 'What did Trichet say the ECB will offer?' is answered by copying 'Longer Loans' from the text, while the TELLME question 'What does full allotment mean in the context of central bank lending operations?' requires an explanatory answer beyond the text.
Figure 1. QA pairs produced with InstPT and TELLME for the same plain text. InstPT uses reading-comprehension QA whose answers are copied from the context (Longer Loans); TELLME asks descriptive questions that connect concepts in the text to related knowledge (what does full allotment mean in central bank lending?), reinforcing knowledge in the way a quiz does.

Abstract

Continual pre-training (CPT) has been widely adopted as a method for domain expansion in large language models. However, CPT has consistently been accompanied by challenges, such as the difficulty of acquiring large-scale domain-specific datasets and high computational costs. In this study, we propose a novel method called Test-Enhanced Learning for Language Model Enrichment (TELLME) to alleviate these issues. TELLME leverages the Test-Enhanced Learning (TEL) principle, whereby the model’s learning efficiency is improved using quizzes during training. It integrates this principle with CPT, thereby promoting efficient domain-specific knowledge acquisition and long-term memory retention. Experimental results demonstrate that TELLME outperforms existing methods by up to 23.6% in the financial domain and achieves a 9.8% improvement in long-term memory retention.

Keywords Test-enhanced learning (TEL) Testing effect Continual pre-training (CPT) Domain adaptation Synthetic QA data Knowledge retention Catastrophic forgetting Financial LLM Medical LLM

Method

Schematic of seven training paradigms showing which segments receive loss. Continual pre-training: plain text, all tokens trained. Instruction tuning: question masked, answer trained. PIT: plain text and QA as separate samples, question masked. InstPT: plain text, question and answer all trained. TELLME: plain text followed by question and answer in one sequence, question masked. Inv-TEL: question and answer before plain text. TEL-Q/L: like TELLME but the question is also trained.
Figure 4. Data composition and token-level loss masking across training paradigms (green check: loss computed; red cross: masked). TELLME places plain text and its QA pairs in a single training sequence and computes the loss on plain-text and answer tokens only; Inv-TEL reverses the order and TEL-Q/L also trains on question tokens. (Appendix figure in the paper.)

In educational psychology, test-enhanced learning (TEL) describes the testing effect: taking quizzes, especially open-ended explanatory ones, improves learning and long-term retention more than re-reading. TELLME transfers this idea to continual pre-training (CPT) of LLMs:

  1. Quiz generation. For each domain document, GPT-4o-mini generates M = 3 descriptive question–answer pairs that are related to the text but cannot be answered by copying from it (concept mapping, e.g. “How do high-frequency trading strategies impact market volatility?”). 100K samples were built from PubMed abstracts and Bloomberg financial news for about $12; an LLM-as-a-judge rated them 4.03 out of 5 on average.
  2. Joint training sample. Each training sequence is X = (t, q1, a1, …, qM, aM): the plain text followed by its quiz.
  3. Loss masking. The causal language modeling loss is computed on plain-text and answer tokens, while question tokens are masked, so CPT and quiz learning happen in a single forward–backward pass.

TELLME is compared with CPT, CPT followed by instruction tuning (CPT + IT, same tokens as TELLME), and InstPT on Llama-3.2-1B, Llama-3.2-3B, Llama-3.1-8B and SmolLM2-1.7B, using FOMC, NIFTY and MMLU-Finance for finance and HeadQA, MedMCQA and MMLU-Clinical for medicine.

Main Results

  • Best overall average. TELLME achieves the highest average score across finance and medicine for every model (e.g. 40.73 on Llama-3.1-8B vs. 39.94 for CPT), outperforming CPT + IT by 10.0% and InstPT by 6.3% overall.
  • Finance gains. In the finance domain TELLME improves on the base models by about 9.8% on average and outperforms InstPT by 5.1% on average, although InstPT trains on nearly twice as much QA data.
  • Long-term retention. When a finance-trained SmolLM2-1.7B is further trained on medical data, the CPT model loses 5.72% of its finance performance but the TELLME model only 0.94%, ending 9.8% (3.15 points) higher.
  • Efficiency and robustness. TELLME reaches the same perplexity 1.4× faster than CPT; with Mistral-generated or self-generated quizzes it still beats InstPT by 2.27 and 2.61 points (Llama-3.2-3B, finance), and Korean TELLME data raise OLMo2-1B's KoBEST average by 8.4 points.
Table 2. Average accuracy in the finance (FOMC, NIFTY, MMLU-F) and medicine (HeadQA, MedMCQA, MMLU-C) domains under different training methods (subset: domain averages only; per-benchmark scores are in the paper). Bold marks the best value per model, as in the paper. (Table 2 in the paper.)
ModelMethodFinance avg.Medicine avg.Average
Llama-3.2-1BBase30.7332.1631.45
+ CPT29.0532.2630.66
+ CPT + IT30.3629.7630.06
+ InstPT31.1530.0830.61
+ TELLME (ours)33.4632.6233.04
Llama-3.2-3BBase32.9737.6335.30
+ CPT29.9837.2233.60
+ CPT + IT30.8735.6433.26
+ InstPT31.0335.1633.10
+ TELLME (ours)33.8738.2236.05
Llama-3.1-8BBase33.0743.9938.53
+ CPT37.4442.4439.94
+ CPT + IT31.4136.6234.02
+ InstPT36.9938.6637.83
+ TELLME (ours)38.8242.6340.73
SmolLM2-1.7BBase32.5335.4934.01
+ CPT34.2835.2834.78
+ CPT + IT34.6235.7135.17
+ InstPT35.9535.3935.67
+ TELLME (ours)35.8236.1435.98

BibTeX

@inproceedings{kim-etal-2026-tellme,
    title = "{TELLME}: Test-Enhanced Learning for Language Model Enrichment",
    author = "Kim, Minjun  and
      Won, Inho  and
      Lim, HyeonSeok  and
      Kim, MinKyu  and
      Yuk, Junghun  and
      Go, Wooyoung  and
      Park, Jongyoul  and
      Park, Jungyeul  and
      Lim, KyungTae",
    editor = "Demberg, Vera  and
      Inui, Kentaro  and
      Marquez, Llu{\'i}s",
    booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {EACL} 2026",
    month = mar,
    year = "2026",
    address = "Rabat, Morocco",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-eacl.84/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2026.findings-eacl.84",
    pages = "1655--1677",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-386-9"
}
More projects from KAIST MLP Lab →